Century Indemnity Co. v. Bank of Gowanda

265 A.D. 907, 38 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6430
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 1942·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: We are still of the opinion that the decision in the case of Raymond Concrete Pile Co. v. Federation Bank (288 N. Y. 452) is not controlling in the instant case. In that ease the opinion states: “As a general rule * * a banker who knows that a fund on deposit with him is a trust fund cannot appropriate that fund for his private benefit *- * *. But one who relies upon the application of those principles must always affirmatively establish that the bank had notice or knowledge not only that the moneys on deposit were for a trust purpose but also that they were diverted from that purpose.” Again the opinion states: “ It necessarily follows that no trust arises * * * from the mere fact that the contractor received and has in his hands moneys in payment on account of a public improvement.” But, in the instant case, there were findings (findings 17, 18 and 19) supported by evidence, that defendant had notice and knowledge of the fact that the moneys were trust funds and diverted to the payment of the contractor’s debt to the bank. Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Century Indemnity Co. v. Bank of Gowanda, 265 A.D. 907, 38 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 907 (Century Indemnity Co. v. Bank of Gowanda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northside Bank of Tampa v. Electrical Enterprises, Inc.
353 So. 2d 927 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Utica Sheet Metal Corp. v. J. E. Schecter Corp.
25 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v. Koslow
143 F. Supp. 641 (S.D. New York, 1956)