Century Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Net Realty Holding Trust

87 A.D.2d 858, 449 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16339
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1982·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to reform a lease and to declare the rental escalation clause of that lease unconscionable, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated March 13,1981, which denied its motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. While we agree with Special Term that defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint should be denied, the issue of whether defendant should be equitably estopped from asserting the Statute of Limitations as an affirmative defense to plaintiff’s complaint is not a question of law, but rather a question of fact, which should be fully developed and determined upon the trial of the action. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Century Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Net Realty Holding Trust, 87 A.D.2d 858, 449 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

87 A.D.2d 858 (Century Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Net Realty Holding Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.
76 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Putter v. North Shore University Hospital
25 A.D.3d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bloomfield v. Bloomfield
281 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Storey v. Sum
151 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Schirano v. Paggioli
99 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)