Centurion Acquisitions, LP 2M Holdings, LP MMM Holdings, L.P. and Merhdad Moayedi v. Cecil C. Graham and Mary Jo Graham

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 22, 2011·No. 02-11-00149-CV·Published

Opinion

02-11-149-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00149-CV

Centurion Acquisitions, LP; 2M Holdings, LP; MMM Holdings, L.P. and Merhdad Moayedi

APPELLANTS

V.

Cecil C. Graham and Mary Jo Graham

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 16th District Court OF Denton COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellants’ Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

          Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

                                                                             PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  December 22, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Centurion Acquisitions, LP 2M Holdings, LP MMM Holdings, L.P. and Merhdad Moayedi v. Cecil C. Graham and Mary Jo Graham, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Centurion Acquisitions, LP 2M Holdings, LP MMM Holdings, L.P. and Merhdad Moayedi v. Cecil C. Graham and Mary Jo Graham (Centurion Acquisitions, LP 2M Holdings, LP MMM Holdings, L.P. and Merhdad Moayedi v. Cecil C. Graham and Mary Jo Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.