Home/Federal Circuit/Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 F.4th 1025 →
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 11, 2021·No. 20-1768·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 20-1768 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2021

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee ______________________

2020-1768 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018- 01454. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY.

THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS; ANGELA OLIVER, Washington, DC. ______________________ Case: 20-1768 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 05/11/2021

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 11, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2021).

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.