Central Vt. R. v. Bateman

Second Circuit

Central Vt. R. v. Bateman

75 F. 1021, 20 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 1895

DocketNo. 82

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 F. 1021 (Central Vt. R. v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Vt. R. v. Bateman, 75 F. 1021, 20 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936 (2d Cir. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the charge of the trial judg(!, and are satisfied that there was such a conflict of testimony upon the issues of fact as to require a submission of the case to the jury. The decision upon [1022]*1022defendant’s motion for a new trial because the verdict was, as defendant contended, contrary to the evidence, and for excessive damages, is not reviewable in this court Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the charge of the trial judg(!, and are satisfied that there was such a conflict of testimony upon the issues of fact as to require a submission of the case to the jury. The decision upon [1022]*1022defendant’s motion for a new trial because the verdict was, as defendant contended, contrary to the evidence, and for excessive damages, is not reviewable in this court Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 F. 1021, 20 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-vt-r-v-bateman-ca2-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack