Central Vt. R. v. Bateman

Second Circuit

Central Vt. R. v. Bateman

75 F. 1021, 20 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 29, 1895·No. No. 82·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the charge of the trial judg(!, and are satisfied that there was such a conflict of testimony upon the issues of fact as to require a submission of the case to the jury. The decision upon [1022] defendant’s motion for a new trial because the verdict was, as defendant contended, contrary to the evidence, and for excessive damages, is not reviewable in this court Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the charge of the trial judg(!, and are satisfied that there was such a conflict of testimony upon the issues of fact as to require a submission of the case to the jury. The decision upon [1022] defendant’s motion for a new trial because the verdict was, as defendant contended, contrary to the evidence, and for excessive damages, is not reviewable in this court Judgment of circuit court affirmed.

Central Vt. R. v. Bateman, 75 F. 1021, 20 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2936 (2d Cir. 1895).

Pincite

75 F. 1021 (Central Vt. R. v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related