Central United National Bank of Cleve. v. Hendler
This text of 186 N.E. 728 (Central United National Bank of Cleve. v. Hendler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (the court now being constituted of but six judges) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that the defendants in error recover from plaintiff in error their costs herein expended.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 N.E. 728, 127 Ohio St. 38, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 38, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-united-national-bank-of-cleve-v-hendler-ohio-1933.