Central Union Telephone Co. v. Hopper

Indiana Supreme Court

Central Union Telephone Co. v. Hopper

24 N.E. 1091, 124 Ind. 600, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 380

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 26, 1890

DocketNo. 14,320

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 N.E. 1091 (Central Union Telephone Co. v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Union Telephone Co. v. Hopper, 24 N.E. 1091, 124 Ind. 600, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 380 (Ind. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Olds, J.

This was a proceeding to compel the appellant, as a common carrier of telephone messages, by mandate, to furnish telephonic service to the appellees, who were engaged in business in Michigan City. The pleadings are substantially the same, and the questions involved are the same, and arise in substantially the same manner as those presented and decided in the case of the Central Union Telephone Company v. State, ex rel., 123 Ind. 113. The same questions were also involved and considered at length, and the authorities reviewed in the case of the Central Union Telephone Company v. State, ex rel., 118 Ind. 194, and we do not deem it necessary to set out the record, and state the manner in which the questions arise. On the authority of the cases herein cited, this case must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olds, J.

This was a proceeding to compel the appellant, as a common carrier of telephone messages, by mandate, to furnish telephonic service to the appellees, who were engaged in business in Michigan City. The pleadings are substantially the same, and the questions involved are the same, and arise in substantially the same manner as those presented and decided in the case of the Central Union Telephone Company v. State, ex rel., 123 Ind. 113. The same questions were also involved and considered at length, and the authorities reviewed in the case of the Central Union Telephone Company v. State, ex rel., 118 Ind. 194, and we do not deem it necessary to set out the record, and state the manner in which the questions arise. On the authority of the cases herein cited, this case must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 N.E. 1091, 124 Ind. 600, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-union-telephone-co-v-hopper-ind-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack