Central Union Telephone Co. v. Falley

Indiana Supreme Court

Central Union Telephone Co. v. Falley

20 N.E. 145, 118 Ind. 598, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 574

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 2, 1889

DocketNo. 14,268

StatusPublished

This text of 20 N.E. 145 (Central Union Telephone Co. v. Falley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Union Telephone Co. v. Falley, 20 N.E. 145, 118 Ind. 598, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 574 (Ind. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Olds, J.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant, under the act of April 8th, 1885, entitled “An Act prescribing certain duties of telegraph and telephone companies, prohibiting discrimination between patrons, providing penalties therefor, and declaring an emergency,” for the penalty of one hundred dollars for the failure and refusal on the part of the appellant to furnish to the appellee a telephone and telephonic connections, facilities and service, and involves the same questions that were decided in the case of Central U. Tel. Co. v. State, ex rel., ante, p. 194. On the authority of that case the judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olds, J.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant, under the act of April 8th, 1885, entitled “An Act prescribing certain duties of telegraph and telephone companies, prohibiting discrimination between patrons, providing penalties therefor, and declaring an emergency,” for the penalty of one hundred dollars for the failure and refusal on the part of the appellant to furnish to the appellee a telephone and telephonic connections, facilities and service, and involves the same questions that were decided in the case of Central U. Tel. Co. v. State, ex rel., ante, p. 194. On the authority of that case the judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 N.E. 145, 118 Ind. 598, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-union-telephone-co-v-falley-ind-1889.