Central Trust Co. v. Utah Central Railway Co.

16 Utah 21
Utah Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1897·Published

Opinion

Zane, C. J.:

The Continental .Oil Company also intervened in the case of the Central Trust Company of New York v. The Utah Central Railway Co. et al., supra, in which Joseph Goddard was intervener, and the court allowed its claim for supplies to the amount of $1,018.17, and preferred the same to the amount decreed to plaintiff. From so much of the decree as preferred this claim the plaintiff [22]*22also.appealed, and assigns the rendering of it as error. The facts of the oil company’s claim are similar in effect to those of the claim of Goddard in the same case, except that its claim is for necessary supplies used in operating the road.

We regard this appeal as governed by the decision upon the preceding appeal from the allowance and preferment of Goddard’s claim.

The portion of the decree from which this appeal is taken is affirmed.

Barich and Minee, JJ.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Trust Co. v. Utah Central Railway Co., 16 Utah 21 (Utah 1897).

16 Utah 21 (Central Trust Co. v. Utah Central Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.