Central Stock & Grain Exchange v. Board of Trade

63 N.E. 740, 196 Ill. 396
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 1902·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam:

The foregoing opinion of the Appellate Court, from which we have omitted details of the evidence, meets with our full approval, as making a just and proper disposition of the case on the record, and it will be adopted as the opinion of the court. It clearly appears that the quotations of market prices which appellant sought by its bill to compel appellees to continue to furnish, were used, and were obtained for the purpose of being used, in conducting a business in violation of law as well as of its contract with the telegraph company. Appellant was not entitled to any relief of that character. In this respect the case differs materially from New York and Chicago Grain Exchange v. Board of Trade, 127 Ill. 153.

The judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Stock & Grain Exchange v. Board of Trade, 63 N.E. 740, 196 Ill. 396 (Ill. 1902).

63 N.E. 740 (Central Stock & Grain Exchange v. Board of Trade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Keeves
199 N.E. 131 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1935)
Indiana Union Traction Co. v. Scribner
93 N.E. 1014 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
First National Bank of El Paso v. Miller
85 N.E. 312 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1908)
In re A. B. Baxter & Co.
152 F. 137 (Second Circuit, 1907)
Flannery v. People
127 Ill. App. 526 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Dunbar v. Armstrong
115 Ill. App. 549 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)
Weare Commission Co. v. People
70 N.E. 1076 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1904)