Central States, Southeast &, Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Kroger Co.

241 F.3d 842, 2001 WL 204762
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2001
DocketNo. 99-2257, 99-3014
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 F.3d 842 (Central States, Southeast &, Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Kroger Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central States, Southeast &, Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Kroger Co., 241 F.3d 842, 2001 WL 204762 (7th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text of the original opinion. See Central States, Areas Pension Fund v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir.2000). On page 910 of the published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court’s discussion makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and this slip of the pen did not impact the court’s analysis or the result in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 F.3d 842, 2001 WL 204762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-states-southeast-southwest-areas-pension-fund-v-kroger-co-ca7-2001.