Central States Areas v. Kroger Company
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Argued February 17, 2000
Decided February 2, 2001
Before
Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, Appeal from the United States SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, District Court for the and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
No. 93 C 3669
John F. Grady, Judge.
v.
KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text of the original opinion. See Central States, Area Pension Fund v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2000). On page 910 of the published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court's discussion
Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 Page 2
makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the result in the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central States Areas v. Kroger Company (Central States Areas v. Kroger Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.