Central States Areas v. Kroger Company

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2001
Docket99-2257
StatusPublished

This text of Central States Areas v. Kroger Company (Central States Areas v. Kroger Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central States Areas v. Kroger Company, (7th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued February 17, 2000

Decided February 2, 2001

Before

Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge

Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, Appeal from the United States SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, District Court for the and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 93 C 3669

John F. Grady, Judge. v.

KROGER COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text

of the original opinion. See Central States, Area Pension Fund

v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2000). On page 910 of the

published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to

read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court's discussion Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 Page 2

makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and

this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the

result in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Central States Areas v. Kroger Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-states-areas-v-kroger-company-ca7-2001.