Central States Areas v. Kroger Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 2, 2001·No. 99-2257·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued February 17, 2000

Decided February 2, 2001

Before

Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, Appeal from the United States SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, District Court for the and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

No. 93 C 3669

John F. Grady, Judge.

v.

KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text of the original opinion. See Central States, Area Pension Fund v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2000). On page 910 of the published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court's discussion

Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 Page 2

makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the result in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central States Areas v. Kroger Company, (7th Cir. 2001).

Central States Areas v. Kroger Company (Central States Areas v. Kroger Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related