Central States Areas v. Kroger Company
This text of Central States Areas v. Kroger Company (Central States Areas v. Kroger Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
Argued February 17, 2000
Decided February 2, 2001
Before
Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge
Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge
Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, Appeal from the United States SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, District Court for the and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 93 C 3669
John F. Grady, Judge. v.
KROGER COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text
of the original opinion. See Central States, Area Pension Fund
v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2000). On page 910 of the
published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to
read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court's discussion Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 Page 2
makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and
this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the
result in the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Central States Areas v. Kroger Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-states-areas-v-kroger-company-ca7-2001.