Central Security Co. v. Milwaukee-Waukesha Brewing Co.

164 N.W. 994, 166 Wis. 249, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 199
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 13, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 164 N.W. 994 (Central Security Co. v. Milwaukee-Waukesha Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central Security Co. v. Milwaukee-Waukesha Brewing Co., 164 N.W. 994, 166 Wis. 249, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 199 (Wis. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint alleged that the plaintiff at all times mentioned in the complaint was the owner of the premises known as 111 Fourth street; that the defendant was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling beer. [250]*250and that on or about the 28th day of February, 1916, the defendant

“for valuable consideration, by it received, promised and agreed to pay towards the cost of changing the front of the premises known as 111 Fourth street, in the city of Milwaukee, a sum not exceeding three hundred and fifty ($350) dollars, and that the plaintiff, relying upon such promises and agreement, did pursuant thereto cause the said front to be changed, and that the changing of the said front cost no less than three hundred and sixty ($360) dollars, and that the defendant, although often requested, has refused and neglected to pay towards said cost of so changing the said front the sum of three hundred and fifty ($350) dollars, but has only paid one hundred and eighty ($180) dollars on account thereof, and that there is now due and owing to this plaintiff from the said defendant by reason of the foregoing the sum of one hundred and seventy ($110) dollars, together with interest as allowed by law, and that a reasonable time has elapsed since your plaintiff caused said changes to be made at the request of the said defendant, and a reasonable time has elapsed since the time the said plaintiff has paid for the cost of such change of said front.”

The court is of opinion that this case is ruled by Union Nat. Bank v. Cross, 100 Wis. 174, 75 N. W. 992, therefore the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.

Judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance
131 N.W.2d 373 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1964)
Latham v. Casey & King Corp.
127 N.W.2d 225 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1964)
Perry v. Perkins
245 P.2d 405 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1952)
Motowski v. People's Dentists of Wisconsin
198 N.W. 465 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.W. 994, 166 Wis. 249, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-security-co-v-milwaukee-waukesha-brewing-co-wis-1917.