Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Colchester, Hamden, Hancock, Walton, Andes and Tompkins, Delaware County v. State

18 A.D.2d 943, 237 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4425

This text of 18 A.D.2d 943 (Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Colchester, Hamden, Hancock, Walton, Andes and Tompkins, Delaware County v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Colchester, Hamden, Hancock, Walton, Andes and Tompkins, Delaware County v. State, 18 A.D.2d 943, 237 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

— The lands appropriated by filing of map on March 4, 1958, were held by respondent school district for school purposes and thus in a governmental capacity. (Brush V. Commissioner, 300 U. S. 352, 371; Matter of Bethlehem Union Free School v. Wilson, 303 N. Y. 107,113; Union Free School Hist. No. 14 v. Village of Hewlett Bay Park, 279 App. Div. 618-619.) Consequently, the district was not entitled to compensation upon the taking by the State. (Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178-179; People ex rel. Palmer v. Travis, 223 N. Y. 150, 166-167.) Section 3 of the General Municipal Law, providing a different rule in respect of property of a “municipal corporation” appropriated for a “substantially [944]*944different ” purpose was enacted subsequent to the appropriation here but it may nevertheless be noted that, whether through oversight or otherwise, school districts, not included within the definition in section 2 of the act (and see Johnston v. Gordon, 247 App. Div. 40), were not brought within the provisions of section 3, and although they are treated as municipal corporations for other purposes (General Corporation Law; § 3, subd. 2) the section cited must, under section 6 of the same act, yield to the conflicting provision of the General Municipal Law. Judgment reversed, on the law, and claim dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh
207 U.S. 161 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Brush v. Commissioner
300 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1937)
People Ex Rel. Palmer v. . Travis
119 N.E. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Johnston v. Gordon
247 A.D. 40 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Union Free School District No. 14 v. Village of Hewlett Bay Park
279 A.D. 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. Wilson
100 N.E.2d 159 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 943, 237 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-school-district-no-1-of-the-towns-of-colchester-hamden-hancock-nyappdiv-1963.