Central Savings Bank v. Reutlinger

242 A.D. 814

Opinion

The justice at Special Term was fully warranted in determining the issue upon affidavits. The plaintiff’s asking price clearly indicated that there was no ground for a deficiency judgment. Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Savings Bank v. Reutlinger, 242 A.D. 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 814 (Central Savings Bank v. Reutlinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.