Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl

4 A.2d 281, 125 N.J. Eq. 91, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 630
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 6, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 A.2d 281 (Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl, 4 A.2d 281, 125 N.J. Eq. 91, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 630 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs in this case, the argument and briefs of counsel, and we concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that a preliminary injunction should issue.

The- order appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claus v. Brodhead
116 A.2d 725 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating Rink
82 A.2d 458 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.2d 281, 125 N.J. Eq. 91, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-rr-co-v-simandl-nj-1939.