Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl
This text of 4 A.2d 281 (Central R.R. Co. v. Simandl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs in this case, the argument and briefs of counsel, and we concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that a preliminary injunction should issue.
The- order appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.2d 281, 125 N.J. Eq. 91, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-rr-co-v-simandl-nj-1939.