Central Railroad v. Bourbon County

116 U.S. 538, 6 S. Ct. 601, 29 L. Ed. 725, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1794
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 1, 1886·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief-Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is denied. Cases in which the execution of the revenue laws of a State have been enjoined or stayed are only to be advanced on motion of the State or the party claiming under such laws. Rev. Stat. § 949. Here the motion is made by the party taxed, and the suit is by the county claiming under the tax laws for the recovery of a tax. Inasmuch as the county does not move we cannot presume that “the operations .of the government of the State will be embarrassed by delay.” Under the rule announced in Hoge v. Richmond & Danville Railroad Co., 93 U. S. 1, it must be shown that such will be the effect of delay before a case will be advanced, even on motion by the State or those claiming under it.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Railroad v. Bourbon County, 116 U.S. 538, 6 S. Ct. 601, 29 L. Ed. 725, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1794 (1886).

116 U.S. 538 (Central Railroad v. Bourbon County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. Crump
69 S.W. 572 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1902)
Shreve v. Copper Bell Mining Co.
28 P. 315 (Montana Supreme Court, 1891)
United States v. King
9 Mont. 75 (Montana Supreme Court, 1889)