Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wiggins
18 S.E. 187, 91 Ga. 208
Opinion
In the head-notes we have developed fully the views of the court upon the whole case, and no further discussion seems necessary.. There was- no error in denying a new trial. ' Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wiggins, 18 S.E. 187, 91 Ga. 208 (Ga. 1892).
18 S.E. 187 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wiggins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Blackshear
194 S.E.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Emory University v. Lee
104 S.E.2d 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
State v. Withrow
96 S.E.2d 913 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1957)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Wright
54 S.E.2d 655 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Gilpin
73 S.W.2d 1054 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Davis v. Ragin & Winn
66 S.E. 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Minor
59 S.E. 81 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Bowman
75 P. 482 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1904)
Barker v. Stewart
36 S.E. 238 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)