Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. White

12 S.E. 365, 86 Ga. 202, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 213
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 21, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, Justice.

The trial judge did not err in dismissing the writ of certiorari. Certiorari will not lie where the judgment of a justice of the peace is for $50 or under, unless based exclusively upon a question of law. Where facts alone are involved, or both law and fact, appeal to a jury in the justice’s court is the proper remedy. In this case essential facts were in question, and appeal was the proper remedy, and not certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. White, 12 S.E. 365, 86 Ga. 202, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 213 (Ga. 1890).

12 S.E. 365 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.
31 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)