Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. White
12 S.E. 365, 86 Ga. 202, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 213
Opinion
The trial judge did not err in dismissing the writ of certiorari. Certiorari will not lie where the judgment of a justice of the peace is for $50 or under, unless based exclusively upon a question of law. Where facts alone are involved, or both law and fact, appeal to a jury in the justice’s court is the proper remedy. In this case essential facts were in question, and appeal was the proper remedy, and not certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. White, 12 S.E. 365, 86 Ga. 202, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 213 (Ga. 1890).
12 S.E. 365 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.
31 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)