Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Rouse

5 S.E. 627, 80 Ga. 442
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 19, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 S.E. 627 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Rouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Rouse, 5 S.E. 627, 80 Ga. 442 (Ga. 1888).

Opinion

Roney, Judge.

This is the second time this case has been to this court. When here before (October term, 1886, 77 Ga. 303,) it was held, under the facts of the case then made, that the Central Railroad & Banking Company was liable in damages, and the case was sent back for a new trial solely because the court below erred in his charge to the jury on the measure of damages.

The facts upon the last trial do not materially differ-from the facts on the first trial; so treating the liability of the company as settled, it is only necessary to examine the charge of the court, which is set out in full in the record, to see if any error was committed on the subject of damages.

We find no error in the charge. The measure of damages was fairly submitted to the j ury, in strict compliance with the rule laid down by this court when the case was here before.

After inspecting the whole record and the errors complained of, we are satisfied that the court below was right in refusing a new trial, and we therefore affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheelan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
52 N.W. 119 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 S.E. 627, 80 Ga. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-railroad-banking-co-v-rouse-ga-1888.