Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Opie
This text of 58 Ga. 346 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Opie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Though the court had twice granted a new trial on similar verdicts, to leave the third verdict to stand was right, there being evidence that the train was running at unusual [348]*348speed, and. that no effort was made to stop or slacken it, and the evidence being conflicting as to whether there were, or were not, bnshes and briers contiguous to the line of road, calculated to impede the mare in espaping to the open field. Even if the engine or cars did not touch the animal, she was probably not allowed as much time to get clear of danger as ordinary and reasonable care, even for the safety of the train, required. Her fall into the stock-gap of the company might not have Occurred (and of this the jury were to judge) if timely effort had been made to check the unusual speed at which the train was running. Why some effort was not made is wholly unexplained — see 46 Ind. R., 229; 48 Ga., 514.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 Ga. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-railroad-banking-co-v-opie-ga-1877.