Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Farley

15 S.E. 34, 89 Ga. 180
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 31, 1892·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

[180] Judgment affirmed.

Hall & Hammond and J. J. Hunt, for plaintiff in error. Beck & Cleveland, by brief, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Farley, 15 S.E. 34, 89 Ga. 180 (Ga. 1892).

15 S.E. 34 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Farley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendricks v. State
278 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Simmons v. Noble
65 S.E.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Southeastern Pipe-Line Co. v. Garrett
16 S.E.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Woodruff v. Bowers
140 S.E. 844 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Hetrick v. State
109 S.E. 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Commercial City Bank v. Mitchell
105 S.E. 57 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Andrews v. State
94 S.E. 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rogers
94 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)