Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Carswell
This text of 54 Ga. 251 (Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Carswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The act of 1869, providing that the words “in or by the running of the cars or engines” shall be struck out of section 3339 of the Code, (Irwin’s,) leaves that section very broad. It thus covers “injuries” óf any kind, since it will then read that the action may be' brought in the county where the cause of action originated, when any one has been “injured” in person or property. Is the wrong complained of in this case an “injury” to the person or property of the complainant? If so, the action lies in the county where the cause of action originated. If there be any other proviso, it can only be that the road must run into the county, as provided by the acts of 1853 and 1856.. The argument attempted to be drawn from' the words used by Judge Walker in 35th Georgia, 144, is, as we think, not a fair one. The language is, it is true, a little inaccurate, but it is plain from the whole decision that he only meant that the Code of 1863 did not contain the broad language of the act of 1859. The act of 1869 makes the law fully as broad as that act, and we, for this reason, affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Ga. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-railroad-banking-co-v-carswell-ga-1875.