Central R. & Banking Co. of Georgia v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. of New York

Fourth Circuit

Central R. & Banking Co. of Georgia v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. of New York

125 F. 1001, 60 C.C.A. 400, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4248

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 5, 1903

DocketNo. 460

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 F. 1001 (Central R. & Banking Co. of Georgia v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central R. & Banking Co. of Georgia v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. of New York, 125 F. 1001, 60 C.C.A. 400, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4248 (4th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

KELLER, District Judge.

This case comes up on an appeal from a decretal order entered on the 3d day of March, 1902, dismissing the intervention of the Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company. In the record in this case appears the elaborate opinion of the learned Circuit Judge who-tried this case in the court below, and as that opinion contains a full statement of the material facts, and as its conclusions are approved by this court, we adopt that opinion (113 Fed. 405) as the opinion of the court herein. The decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of South. Carolina dismissing the intervention of the Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLER, District Judge.

This case comes up on an appeal from a decretal order entered on the 3d day of March, 1902, dismissing the intervention of the Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company. In the record in this case appears the elaborate opinion of the learned Circuit Judge who-tried this case in the court below, and as that opinion contains a full statement of the material facts, and as its conclusions are approved by this court, we adopt that opinion (113 Fed. 405) as the opinion of the court herein. The decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of South. Carolina dismissing the intervention of the Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 F. 1001, 60 C.C.A. 400, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-r-banking-co-of-georgia-v-farmers-loan-trust-co-of-new-ca4-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack