Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran
48 Cal. 65
Opinion
It was held in Savings and Loan Society v. Austin, 46 Cal. 415, and the other tax' cases decided at the October term, 1873, and in Houghton v. Austin, 47 Cal. 646, that an injunction Avas not the proper remedy in those actions. Upon the authority of those cases, the order dissolving the injunction is affirmed.
Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran, 48 Cal. 65 (Cal. 1874).
48 Cal. 65 (Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. Byram
153 P.2d 746 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
Lent v. Tillson
14 P. 71 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell
13 F. 429 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1882)
Bank of Santa Rosa v. Chalfant
52 Cal. 170 (California Supreme Court, 1877)