Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran
48 Cal. 65
This text of 48 Cal. 65 (Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Central Pacific Railroad v. Corcoran, 48 Cal. 65 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
It was held in Savings and Loan Society v. Austin, 46 Cal. 415, and the other tax' cases decided at the October term, 1873, and in Houghton v. Austin, 47 Cal. 646, that an injunction Avas not the proper remedy in those actions. Upon the authority of those cases, the order dissolving the injunction is affirmed.
Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. Byram
153 P.2d 746 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
Lent v. Tillson
14 P. 71 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell
13 F. 429 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1882)
Bank of Santa Rosa v. Chalfant
52 Cal. 170 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-pacific-railroad-v-corcoran-cal-1874.