Central Pacific Bank v. Ayson

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-MAR-2024 08:17 AM Dkt. 22 ODMR

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

CENTRAL PACIFIC BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

FERDINAND CARREON AYSON and VICTORIA ESPRECION AYSON, Defendants-Appellants, and FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK; PENTAGON FEDERAL C.U.; CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A.; VIVINT SOLAR, INC.;

EWA BY GENTRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; VIVINT SOLAR DEVELOPER, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20;

DOE ENTITIES 1-20; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Second Motion for Order

(Second Motion), filed March 4, 2024, by self-represented

Defendants-Appellants Ferdinand Carreon Ayson and Victoria

Esprecion Ayson (collectively, Aysons), which the court construes

as a motion for reconsideration, the papers in support, and the

record, it appears that the Aysons seek reconsideration of the

court's February 26, 2024 Order Denying Motion for Stay, but the

Aysons fail to demonstrate that the court overlooked or

misapprehended any point of law or fact. See Hawai i Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Motion

is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 7, 2024.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge