Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Jessie

128 So. 116, 23 Ala. App. 513, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 126
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 22, 1930·No. 4 Div. 595.·Published

Opinion

RIGE, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against appellant, in favor of appellee, for the sum of $30, on account of the negligent killing of one cow.

There is no recital in the bill of exceptions sufficient to, show the making of the motion for a new trial, the ruling thereon, and the exception thereto. In such situation, the action of the trial court in refusing same will not be reviewed. Ex parte Grace (Grace v. Old Dominion Garment Co.) 213 Ala. 550, 105 So. 707.

We have carefully read the entire testimony, but are unwilling to say that there was not a “scintilla of evidence” tending to show the existence of negligence, as charged. Where this is true, we will not, of course, say that the lower court erred in refusing to give, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge in its favor. McMillan v. Aiken et al., 205 Ala. 35, 88 So. 135.

No other questions -are presented, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Jessie, 128 So. 116, 23 Ala. App. 513, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 126 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

128 So. 116 (Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Jessie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMillan v. Aiken
88 So. 135 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Grace v. Old Dominion Garment Co.
105 So. 707 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Grace v. Old Dominion Garment Co.
105 So. 707 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)