Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Clifton
80 So. 36, 202 Ala. 214, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 348
Opinion
This case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and the only question raised is one of fact. Upon due consideration, this court is unable to say that the judgment rendered in the trial court is plainly contrary to the weight of the evidence. The judgment must be affirmed; therefore — ■
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Clifton, 80 So. 36, 202 Ala. 214, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 348 (Ala. 1918).
80 So. 36 (Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Clifton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McSwean v. McSwean
86 So. 646 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)