Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sturgis
This text of 48 So. 810 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sturgis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The third count, filed as an amendment, was within the lis pendens, and related back to the original complaint, so as to intercept the running of the statute of limitations as against the amended count. —L. & N. R. R. v. Woods, 105 Ala. 561, 17 South. 41; Alabama Co. v. Heald, 154 Ala. 580, 45 South. 686. The suit having been brought within a year after the alleged injury, the cause of action was not barred, and the pleas were not proven, even if this action was barred by the statute of one year, instead of six, which Ave need not decide.— Rasco v. Jefferson, 142 Ala. 705, 38 South. 246; N. C. & St. L. R. R. v. Hill, 146 Ala. 240, 40 South. 612.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 810, 159 Ala. 222, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-sturgis-ala-1909.