Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Stamps

87 S.E. 702, 17 Ga. App. 453, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 676
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 10, 1916·No. 6363·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. In an action against a common carrier for a failure safely to transport and deliver goods committed to it by a shipper, the carrier having received the shipment in good order and delivered it to the consignee, or the transferee of the consignee, in a damaged condition, particular acts of negligence nee'd not be alleged, and if alleged may be treated as surplusage. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Warfield, 129 Ga. 473 (59 S. E. 234); Southern Express Co. v. Bailey, 7 Ga. App. 331 (66 S. E. 960).

2. The court did not err in refusing to give the requested charge.

3. Whilé there were some errors in the charge of the court, in the light of the amount of the verdict returned they do not require a new trial.

4. There was some evidence to support the verdict, and, the trial judge having approved it, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Stamps, 87 S.E. 702, 17 Ga. App. 453, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 676 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 702 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Stamps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heath v. Sandersville Railroad
98 S.E. 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)