Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sparks

101 S.E. 716, 24 Ga. App. 640, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 985
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 23, 1919·No. 10911·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.

The allegations in the petition in this case and the amendment thereto are substantially the same as those in the case of Smith v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 22 Ga. App. 572 (96 S. E. 570), and the ruling made in that case controls the decision of this case. The court [641] erred in allowing tlie amendment, and in thereafter overruling the demurrer to the petition as amended.

Decided December 23, 1919. Action for damages; from Talbot superior court—Judge Howard. September 1, 1919. Battle & Hollis, for plaintiff in error. J. J. Bull & Son, contra.

Judgment reversed,

Jenlcins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sparks, 101 S.E. 716, 24 Ga. App. 640, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 985 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

101 S.E. 716 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
96 S.E. 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)