Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rountree

73 S.E. 1095, 10 Ga. App. 696, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 647
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1912
Docket3753
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 1095 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rountree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rountree, 73 S.E. 1095, 10 Ga. App. 696, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

1. Tlie written requests to charge so far as applicable, are fully and clearly covered by the general instructions to the jury.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court, considered in connection with the charge as a whole, contain no error.

3. The law of comparative negligence and consequent diminution of damages, embodied in the Civil Code (1910), § 2781, was correctly charged, and the size of the verdict indicates that it was applied to the evidence by the jury, favorably to the defendant.

4. No error appears, and the evidence fully supports the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Starks v. Robinson
375 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 1095, 10 Ga. App. 696, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-rountree-gactapp-1912.