Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rogers

36 S.E. 946, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 851
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 8, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 36 S.E. 946 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rogers, 36 S.E. 946, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 851 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence showed that the damage to the live stock of the plaintiff resulted from his negligent failure to comply with that part of the special contract of affreightment in which he undertook to accompany and to water, feed, and attend such stock. The verdict against the defendant company was, therefore, error, and should have been set aside on motion for a new trial. Central Railroad v. Bryant, 73 Ga. 722; Boaz v. Central R. Co., 87 Ga. 463 ; Georgia R. Co. v. Reid, 91 Ga. 377.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central Railroad v. Bryant
73 Ga. 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)
Boaz & Co. v. Central Railroad
13 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Reid
17 S.E. 934 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 946, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-rogers-ga-1900.