Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rogers
36 S.E. 946, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 851
Opinion
The evidence showed that the damage to the live stock of the plaintiff resulted from his negligent failure to comply with that part of the special contract of affreightment in which he undertook to accompany and to water, feed, and attend such stock. The verdict against the defendant company was, therefore, error, and should have been set aside on motion for a new trial. Central Railroad v. Bryant, 73 Ga. 722; Boaz v. Central R. Co., 87 Ga. 463 ; Georgia R. Co. v. Reid, 91 Ga. 377.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rogers, 36 S.E. 946, 111 Ga. 865, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 851 (Ga. 1900).
36 S.E. 946 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central Railroad v. Bryant
73 Ga. 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)
Boaz & Co. v. Central Railroad
13 S.E. 711 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Reid
17 S.E. 934 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)