Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Radford

130 S.E. 363, 34 Ga. App. 484, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 332
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 10, 1925
Docket16564
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 363 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Radford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Radford, 130 S.E. 363, 34 Ga. App. 484, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 332 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant having admitted that he owed the plaintiff $15.67, the judgment directing a verdict for the defendant was error.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Kirkland & Kirkland, for plaintiff. G. W. Turner, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 363, 34 Ga. App. 484, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-radford-gactapp-1925.