Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Pitts

85 S.E. 285, 16 Ga. App. 314, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 607
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 7, 1915·No. 6088·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

Though the placing of cross-ties at a switch on the line of a railway company for its acceptance and use, and their subsequent removal by some one, might create a presumption that the ties had been accepted and used by the company, and a corresponding obligation on its part to pay therefor, yet where positive, unequivocal, and uncontradicted testimony denies that the ties were ever inspected or received by the company, this presumption- is legally rebutted. The verdict against the railway company in this case was therefore unauthorized, and the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Pitts, 85 S.E. 285, 16 Ga. App. 314, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 607 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

85 S.E. 285 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RED TOP CAB COMPANY, INC. v. Hyder
204 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Blount v. Sutton
152 S.E.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Drake
94 S.E. 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)