Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Orr
This text of 57 S.E. 89 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The material evidence upon the issues in this case was of such character as to render it proper for the court to charge the law relative to the differénee between the weight to be attributed to positive testimony and that to be attributed to negative testimony.
2. While instructing the jury upon that subject, the court charged broadly that positive testimony was to be believed in preference to negative testimony, without giving in connection therewith the appropriate qualification relative to the credibility of the witnesses. Such omission rendered the charge erroneous, and will require a reversal of the judg[77]*77ment. See, in this connection, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. O’Neill, 127 Ga. 685.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 S.E. 89, 128 Ga. 76, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-orr-ga-1907.