Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Newton

97 S.E. 553, 23 Ga. App. 96, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 61
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 23, 1918
Docket9655
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 553 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Newton, 97 S.E. 553, 23 Ga. App. 96, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition as amended.

2. This court, under all the facts of the ease, can not hold that the verdict for the plaintiff ($1,519.17) was excessive.

3. This not being a case where the entire injury sued for was to the peace, happiness, or feelings of the plaintiff, it was reversible error for the court to instruct the jury that they should weigh “the worldly circumstances of the parties.” Georgia Railroad v. Homer, 73 Ga. 251 (1), 257; Atlanta Consolidated Street Ry. Co. v. Hardage, 93 Ga. 457 (3) (21 S. E. 100) ; Southern Railway Co. v. Phillips, 136 Ga. 282 (71 S. E. 414).

4. The plaintiff, in addition to suing for special elements of damage, such as lost time, doctor’s bills, and damage to an automobile, sued! for personal injuries and for pain and suffering. It was therefore reversible error for the court to charge the jury, in substance, that they had the right to add to any damages they might find for the plaintiff seven per cent, interest for such time as they saw proper to do so, taking into consideration the time of the injury, or the length of time that the damages had been withheld. Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Young, 81 Ga. 397 (1), 412 (7 S. E. 912, 12 Am. St. R. 320).

5. Except as indicated above, no reversible error appears to have been committed upon the trial of the case.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding. Action for damages: from Jasper superior court—Judge Park. March 16, 1918. Harris, Harris & Witman, A. S. Thurman, Greene F. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Samuel H. Sibley, Eugene M. Baynes, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theo v. Crawford
166 S.E.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Sharpe v. Frost
95 S.E.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Atlantic Ice & Coal Co. v. Wages
159 S.E. 878 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Hooks v. Sanford
116 S.E. 221 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 553, 23 Ga. App. 96, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-newton-gactapp-1918.