Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Neidlinger

35 S.E. 364, 110 Ga. 329, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 434
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 3, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 S.E. 364 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Neidlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Neidlinger, 35 S.E. 364, 110 Ga. 329, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 434 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Little, J.

A railroad company is not liable for an injury simply because, at the time it was occasioned, the train causing the same was being operated in a manner forbidden by law. To make the company liable, the failure to properly conduct the train must have operated as a cause of the injury. Western & Atlantic R. R. Co. v. Main, 64 Ga. 649. Accordingly, when, in the trial of an action to recover damages for killing a cow, proof is made that the train was passing through a town at a speed of twenty miles an hour or more, and that such speed was not checked in approaching a crossing, and it did not appear that there was any ordinance or by-law of the town regulating the speed of passing railroad-trains, the presumption of negligence which arose by showing that a cow was struck and killed by the locomotive was rebutted when it was conclusively shown that the injury did not occur on a crossing or public road, hut at a point some forty or fifty yards beyond the same, and that the animal suddenly came on the track at a point so nearly in front of the locomotive that, nothwithstanding all possible efforts, the progress of the train could hot he arrested before the animal was struck. The failure to check the speed, not being the cause of the injury, did not render the company liable. Prather v. Richmond & Danville R. R. Co., 80 Ga. 437; Ivy v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Ry. Co., 88 Ga. 71; Georgia Southern & Florida R. R. Co. v. Williams, 93 Ga. 253; Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Burke, Id. 319; Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Ry. Co. v. Gravitt, Id. 369; Martin v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 95 Ga. 361.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Martin
53 S.E.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Huckabee v. Grace
173 S.E. 744 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Duggan
52 S.E. 768 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Strickland
39 S.E. 943 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.E. 364, 110 Ga. 329, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-neidlinger-ga-1900.