Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McRee

96 S.E. 707, 22 Ga. App. 594, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 613
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 1, 1918·No. 9356·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. A petition' to recover damages from a railroad company, which alleges that the defendant “destroyed a considerable, portion of plaintiff’s fence,” is too indefinite to withstand a special demurrer which makes the objection that “it is not alleged how much fence was destroyed.”

2. The other grounds of the demurrer ar.e without merit. See, in this connection, Ellis v. Pullman, 95 Ga. 445 (3), 446 (22 S. E. 568); Augusta & Savannah Railroad Co. v. McElmurry, 24 Ga. 75, 78; Sims v. Western & Atlantic Railroad Co., 111 Ga. 820 (35 S. E. 696); Southern Pine Co. v. Smith, 113 Ga. 629 (38 S. E. 960); Atkinson, v. Dismuke, 11 Ga. App. 521 (75 S. E. 835).

3. The erroneous ruling on the demurrer, as set out above, rendered the further proceedings nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and EgrweJl, J., concur. A. H. Gray, L. M. Bambo, for plaintiff in error. Park & Stone, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McRee, 96 S.E. 707, 22 Ga. App. 594, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

96 S.E. 707 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McRee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Augusta & Savannah Railroad v. McElmurry
24 Ga. 75 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)
Ellis v. Pullman & Co.
22 S.E. 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Sims v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
35 S.E. 696 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Southern Pine Co. v. Smith
38 S.E. 960 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Atkinson v. Dismuke & Brother
75 S.E. 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)