Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Garland

65 S.E. 384, 133 Ga. 175, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 179
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 12, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 S.E. 384 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Garland, 65 S.E. 384, 133 Ga. 175, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 179 (Ga. 1909).

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. The evidence, while conflicting, ivas sufficient to authorize the verdict.

2. The portions of the charge excepted to were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The written requests to charge, upon refusal to give which error is assigned, were not in themselves perfect and complete statements of the law applicable to the issues sought to be covered by them, and the court did not err in refusing to embody such requests in his instructions to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Rel. Reinhart v. Callahan
229 P. 702 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 384, 133 Ga. 175, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-garland-ga-1909.