Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Garland
This text of 65 S.E. 384 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence, while conflicting, ivas sufficient to authorize the verdict.
2. The portions of the charge excepted to were not erroneous for any reason assigned.
3. The written requests to charge, upon refusal to give which error is assigned, were not in themselves perfect and complete statements of the law applicable to the issues sought to be covered by them, and the court did not err in refusing to embody such requests in his instructions to the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 S.E. 384, 133 Ga. 175, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-garland-ga-1909.