Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier

84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 660, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 3, 1915
Docket5630
StatusPublished

This text of 84 S.E. 175 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier, 84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 660, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Wade, -J.

Viewing the charge of the court as a whole, there is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error; a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, as the allegations of the petition were substantially proved as laid (Dozier v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 12 Ga. App. 753, 78 S. E. 203) ; and the verdict returned was not excessive. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dozier v. State
78 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Dozier v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
78 S.E. 469 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 660, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-dozier-gactapp-1915.