Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier
84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 660, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29
Opinion
Viewing the charge of the court as a whole, there is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error; a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, as the allegations of the petition were substantially proved as laid (Dozier v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 12 Ga. App. 753, 78 S. E. 203) ; and the verdict returned was not excessive. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier, 84 S.E. 175, 15 Ga. App. 660, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
84 S.E. 175 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dozier v. State
78 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Dozier v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
78 S.E. 469 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)