Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier

Supreme Court of Georgia

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier

45 S.E. 67, 117 Ga. 793, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 337

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 26, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 S.E. 67 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier, 45 S.E. 67, 117 Ga. 793, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 337 (Ga. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Lamab, J.

In a suit for damages for killing stock the plaintiff offered no eyewitness to the transaction. While weak and unsatisfactory, the testimony as to the tracks of the animal and other physical facts was sufficient, when aided hy the presumption of negligence, to warrant a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the evidence of the engineer and fireman tended to show the exercise of ordinary care and diligence. See Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Harden, 113 Ga. 455, 114 Ga. 548.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamab, J.

In a suit for damages for killing stock the plaintiff offered no eyewitness to the transaction. While weak and unsatisfactory, the testimony as to the tracks of the animal and other physical facts was sufficient, when aided hy the presumption of negligence, to warrant a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the evidence of the engineer and fireman tended to show the exercise of ordinary care and diligence. See Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Harden, 113 Ga. 455, 114 Ga. 548.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 S.E. 67, 117 Ga. 793, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-of-georgia-railway-co-v-dozier-ga-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack