Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Turner

40 So. 355, 145 Ala. 441, 1906 Ala. LEXIS 481
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 10, 1906·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

TYSON, J.

The cow was killed near a public road crossing by the passenger train of defendant running against her and knocking her from the track. This made out a prima facie case for plaintiff, and imposed upon defendant the burden of acquitting itself of negligence. — Code 1896, §§ 3440, 3443 ; So. Ry. Co. v. Reaves, 129 Ala. 457, 29 South. 594 ; A. G. S. Ry. Co. v. Boyd, 124 Ala. 525, 27 South. 408. Under the' testimony it is clear that the affirmative charge, requested by defendant, was properly refused. — L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Cochran, 105 Ala. 354, 16 South. 797. Neither of the other charges refused to defendant postulated the fact that the engineer was keeping a proper lookout for animals on or in close proximity to the track, or that the train Avas properly equipped. — Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. [444] Stark, 126 Ala. 368, 28 South. 411 ; Sou. Ry. Co. v. Reaves, supra. They were therefore properly refused. Affirmed.

Dowdell, Simpson, and Anderson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Turner, 40 So. 355, 145 Ala. 441, 1906 Ala. LEXIS 481 (Ala. 1906).

40 So. 355 (Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Vaughan
92 So. 552 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Mims
92 So. 548 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
First Bank v. Mayfield Woolen Mills
40 So. 954 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Pogue
40 So. 565 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Brister
40 So. 512 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)