Central National Bank v. Haseltine

Missouri Court of Appeals

Central National Bank v. Haseltine

73 Mo. App. 60, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 17

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 4, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 Mo. App. 60 (Central National Bank v. Haseltine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central National Bank v. Haseltine, 73 Mo. App. 60, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 17 (Mo. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

TnANSEEBKED TO SOPEEME COUNT.

Bond, J.

This is a suit upon certain notes executed to the plaintiff by the defendant. The defense is that usurious interest was embraced in said notes contrary to the provisions of section 5198 of the United States statutes concerning national banks. The decision of this question involves a construction of a federal statute. Where one construction of a United States statute defeats, and the other sustains, a disputed right, the cause is one arising under the constitutional provision vesting the appellate jurisdiction thereof in the supreme court. Const. Mo., art. 6, sec. 12; Starin v. New York, 115 U. S. 248. This cause will therefore be transferred to the supreme court in accordance with the provisions of section 3300 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TnANSEEBKED TO SOPEEME COUNT.

Bond, J.

This is a suit upon certain notes executed to the plaintiff by the defendant. The defense is that usurious interest was embraced in said notes contrary to the provisions of section 5198 of the United States statutes concerning national banks. The decision of this question involves a construction of a federal statute. Where one construction of a United States statute defeats, and the other sustains, a disputed right, the cause is one arising under the constitutional provision vesting the appellate jurisdiction thereof in the supreme court. Const. Mo., art. 6, sec. 12; Starin v. New York, 115 U. S. 248. This cause will therefore be transferred to the supreme court in accordance with the provisions of section 3300 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 Mo. App. 60, 1898 Mo. App. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-national-bank-v-haseltine-moctapp-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack