Central Nat. Bank of St. Louis, Mo. v. Stout

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Central Nat. Bank of St. Louis, Mo. v. Stout

1912 OK 750, 128 P. 1131, 36 Okla. 284, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 860

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 26, 1912

Docket2298

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK 750 (Central Nat. Bank of St. Louis, Mo. v. Stout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Nat. Bank of St. Louis, Mo. v. Stout, 1912 OK 750, 128 P. 1131, 36 Okla. 284, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 860 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This was a proceeding in attachment, instituted in the district court of Alfalfa county, by the Central National Bank of St. Louis, Mo., against A. H. Stout and J. W. Pickerell, wherein an order of attachment was procured and levied on certain property of defendants. Thereafter *285 said defendants filed their motion to dissolve said order of attachment. In November, 1910, a hearing was had on said motion in said court, and after hearing the evidence of both the plaintiff and defendants the court dissolved said attachment, and from the judgment dissolving same, plaintiff below appeals. The case-made and petition in error were filed in this court January 28, 1911, and the case assigned for submission September 17, 1912. No briefs have yet been filed. Eollowing the rules of this court, the cause is dismissed for failure to file briefs within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This was a proceeding in attachment, instituted in the district court of Alfalfa county, by the Central National Bank of St. Louis, Mo., against A. H. Stout and J. W. Pickerell, wherein an order of attachment was procured and levied on certain property of defendants. Thereafter *285 said defendants filed their motion to dissolve said order of attachment. In November, 1910, a hearing was had on said motion in said court, and after hearing the evidence of both the plaintiff and defendants the court dissolved said attachment, and from the judgment dissolving same, plaintiff below appeals. The case-made and petition in error were filed in this court January 28, 1911, and the case assigned for submission September 17, 1912. No briefs have yet been filed. Eollowing the rules of this court, the cause is dismissed for failure to file briefs within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 750, 128 P. 1131, 36 Okla. 284, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-nat-bank-of-st-louis-mo-v-stout-okla-1912.