Central Manufacturing Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Central Manufacturing Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 551

United States Customs Court·Decided June 21, 1957·No. No. 60910; protest 285896-K (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

“Douglas” valve assemblies in question operate the same in all material respects as the articles the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778); that said valve assemblies constitute one of the components in a complete toilet-box mechanism, represented by exhibit 2 in C. D. 1778; and that said unit must have all of the components in said exhibit 2 to function as a toilet-box mechanism, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

“Douglas” valve assemblies in question operate the same in all material respects as the articles the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778); that said valve assemblies constitute one of the components in a complete toilet-box mechanism, represented by exhibit 2 in C. D. 1778; and that said unit must have all of the components in said exhibit 2 to function as a toilet-box mechanism, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Central Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 551 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 551 (Central Manufacturing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related