Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Herring

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Herring

446 So. 2d 1333, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8108

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 21, 1984

DocketNo. 16001-CA

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 446 So. 2d 1333 (Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Herring, 446 So. 2d 1333, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8108 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge Pro Tern.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case No. 16,000-CA, entitled “Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. v. Pugh T. Huckabay, Jr. and his wife, Julie Rocquin Huckabay”, 446 So.2d 1327, in which a separate opinion is being rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present case is amended to reduce the sum to be paid to James M. Herring and his wife, Paula Vetter Herring, to the sum of [1334]*1334$123,230, of which $9,480 represents the value of the servitude taken and $110,000 represents severance damages to the remainder and $3,750 represents attorney’s fees. Otherwise, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants.

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CULPEPPER, Judge Pro Tern.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case No. 16,000-CA, entitled “Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc. v. Pugh T. Huckabay, Jr. and his wife, Julie Rocquin Huckabay”, 446 So.2d 1327, in which a separate opinion is being rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present case is amended to reduce the sum to be paid to James M. Herring and his wife, Paula Vetter Herring, to the sum of [1334]*1334$123,230, of which $9,480 represents the value of the servitude taken and $110,000 represents severance damages to the remainder and $3,750 represents attorney’s fees. Otherwise, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants.

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 So. 2d 1333, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-louisiana-electric-co-v-herring-lactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack