Central Iron & Coal Co. v. Ballard
This text of 59 So. 47 (Central Iron & Coal Co. v. Ballard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill in this case shows merely that about 12 suits have been brought against the complainant to recover different amounts due to each of the plaintiffs, respectively, for services rendered. Each case involves simply the state of the account between that plaintiff and the defendant, without any reference to any other plaintiff, and without any special complications.
The remedy at law is complete and adequate, and the bill does not bring the case within any of the principles [666]*666of equitable cognizance.—Roanoke Guano Company v. Saunders, et al., 173 Ala. 347, 56 South. 198, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 491; Southern Steel Company v. Hopkins, 174 Ala. 465, 57 South. 11. The chancellor properly sustained the demurrer to the bill, and the decree of the court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 So. 47, 177 Ala. 664, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-iron-coal-co-v-ballard-ala-1912.