Central Ice Cream Candy Co. v. Home Ins. Co.
171 S.E. 797, 171 S.C. 162, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 64
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is a cause in equity. The appellant raises no question as to any legal proposition depended upon by the trial Judge in his decree. The only question raised is that the evidence did not support the conclusion reached.
The burden is on the appellant to show that there was an error below in the findings of fact. Our examination of the record does not convince us that there was such error.
The decree of the county Judge, which will be reported, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central Ice Cream Candy Co. v. Home Ins. Co., 171 S.E. 797, 171 S.C. 162, 1933 S.C. LEXIS 64 (S.C. 1933).
171 S.E. 797 (Central Ice Cream Candy Co. v. Home Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cantrell v. Allstate Insurance
313 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Schafer v. Maryland Casualty Company
123 F. Supp. 873 (E.D. South Carolina, 1954)
Kaiser v. Carolina Life Ins. Co.
65 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
Aiken Petroleum Co. v. National Petroleum Under Writers of Western Millers Mut. Fire Ins.
36 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1945)
Bell v. Mackey
3 S.E.2d 816 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Tavitoff v. Stepovich
91 F.2d 106 (Ninth Circuit, 1937)
Blue Bird Ice Cream Co. v. American Employers' Ins.
189 S.E. 657 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1937)