Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. V. J. Costanzi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. V. J. Costanzi, Inc.

281 A.D. 905, 120 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3739

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 905 (Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. V. J. Costanzi, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. V. J. Costanzi, Inc., 281 A.D. 905, 120 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a third party to recover the amount of a judgment and expenses as against an alleged primary wrongdoer, order denying motion to dismiss the second cause for insufficiency reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. It appears from the face of the complaint that the utility corporation was guilty of active negligence in failing to give warning of the dangerous condition, which was of its own making. (Cf. Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Gonstr. Gorp., 290 H. T. 145, 156.) Holán, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1036.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a third party to recover the amount of a judgment and expenses as against an alleged primary wrongdoer, order denying motion to dismiss the second cause for insufficiency reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. It appears from the face of the complaint that the utility corporation was guilty of active negligence in failing to give warning of the dangerous condition, which was of its own making. (Cf. Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Gonstr. Gorp., 290 H. T. 145, 156.) Holán, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1036.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 905, 120 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/central-hudson-gas-electric-corp-v-v-j-costanzi-inc-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack